by Jonathan Mellberg
In writing an automotive blog I make the general assumption that the majority of my readers may in fact be male, which makes my next question a little risky, especially for guys of my generation or younger. Have you ever seen The Music Man? It’s a musical (duh), set in the early 1900’s. A trickster traveling salesman named Harold Hill descends upon an innocent -and hopelessly naïve- Iowan town to convince them of a need for boys band. To be clear, this is when a boys band meant uniforms and brass instruments, not former Mouseketeers who all step together with their shirts off and simultaneously serenade millions of women.
In writing an automotive blog I make the general assumption that the majority of my readers may in fact be male, which makes my next question a little risky, especially for guys of my generation or younger. Have you ever seen The Music Man? It’s a musical (duh), set in the early 1900’s. A trickster traveling salesman named Harold Hill descends upon an innocent -and hopelessly naïve- Iowan town to convince them of a need for boys band. To be clear, this is when a boys band meant uniforms and brass instruments, not former Mouseketeers who all step together with their shirts off and simultaneously serenade millions of women.
In The Music Man, “Professor” Harold Hill whips the town
into a frenzy by convincing them that a newly delivered billiards table will
be all the young boys' tool of corruption. “Your young men will be fritterin’;
fritterin’ I say!” (As in fritterin’ away their time shootin’ pool) exclaims
Professor Hill, setting up his pitch to sell the town on the creation of a boy’s band. Obviously this is decades before the birth of the muscle car.
For if it had been, the quiet municipality of Rivercity, Iowa would've had a lot
more to worry about than a new pool table…
1967 Camaro Z/28
No, I wasn’t around in the sixties; I wasn’t even a thought.
In fact, my mother was born the same year that saw the birth of the original
pony car, the Ford Mustang. With its instant, phenomenal success, rivals at
Chevy knew they had to think of something quick. By 1967 the boys with the bow
ties launched their rebuttal, the instantly iconic Chevy Camaro. The war
had begun; there’s never been a cease-fire.
Not that it would have mattered, had I been alive back
then. Muscle cars may have been prevalent, but it took (for many Americans) well-padded
wallets to afford these road-going monsters, and owning a Chevy Camaro was no
exception. A fully armed Camaro SS 396 cost roughly $3700 in 1967; sounds
paltry but when factoring in inflation that number swells to $26,348. And its
junior varsity playmate, the 1967 Camaro Z/28 cost $3500, or $24,964 today.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chevrolet_Camaro_Z_28_(02).jpg
Anyone who’s familiar with Chevy knows the SS moniker (for
Super Sport, in case you ever wondered). But there’s another descriptor that's been used since the days of 60’s muscle; the “Z”. A bit more cryptic, the Z
is. There’s the Z/28 (Chevy Camaro), the Z/24 (Chevy Cavalier), the Z/34 (Chevy
Lumina/Monte Carlo), and let’s not forget the Z/26 (Chevy Beretta). Obviously,
the Z performance denotation has never been as fully expressed or meaningful as
in the Camaro, but Z packages haven’t always been exclusive to just Chevy passenger cars, either. There’s been the Z-85 and Z-71 pickup/SUV options, too. And let’s
not forget the Z-51 package for Chevy’s halo car, the Corvette. Yeah, it’s a
lot to keep track of. For today we’ll focus soley on the Camaro Z/28 (and no, for the record I don't know if there is supposed to be a dash ("-") or a forward paranthesee ("/") when correctly labeling Z models).
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1967_Chevrolet_Camaro_Convertible.jpg
As the Camaro was a direct response to the Mustang, so were
its trim levels. While the Camaro SS was meant to battle the Mustang GT, Chevy
also decided to tackle Ford on the Trans Am racing circuit with its own
iteration: The Camaro Z/28. Initially a dealer-installed set of options, the
Z/28 was slightly cheaper than the SS in 1967. Trans Am rules meant its engine capacity was limited to 305 cubic inches or less, with a production cap of 1000 units or less (just over 600 Z's rolled out of the factory in 1967). While
the Camaro SS featured a 396 cubic-inch V8 that produced 325hp and 410lb-ft of torque, the
Z/28’s 302 V8 displayed more modest figures of 290hp and 290lb-ft of torque. While the SS was capable of more factory power, some say the Z/28’s
advertised measurements were laughable; dyno testing had the Z/28 displaying
close to 400 horsepower.
But it was never meant to last. We all know the story; by 1971
the sun was setting on planet muscle car. Engines that big and that powerful would take
decades to reappear. The Z/28 badge hung around while the SS label disappeared
until 1996, when both the Camaro SS and Camaro Z/28 sold side by side for the
first time since the sixties. A ’96 SS Camaro retailed for $24,500 ($37,140 today) and
the Z/28 sold for $19,390 ($29,394 today), continuing the tradition of the SS as the more expensive model.
And then the Camaro went away. Perhaps it was for the best. After all, there have been a few years of the Mustang’s continual lifespan I wouldn’t mind
seeing scrubbed from existence. Of course, Chevy made a comeback-kid appearance
with the all-new Camaro in 2010, eight years since the last Camaro had been built. Since its rebirth we’ve seen V6 and V8-powered Camaros. There’s still an
SS option, as well thunder-striking ZL1 edition (another throwback
moniker from the 60's). And just recently, after years of waiting, we finally have our Z/28
back. But it’s nothing like the original…
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Camaro_Z-28.jpg
Let me elaborate a bit. Sure, a 2014 Camaro SS starts
at $34,500, waaaaay more than 1967’s SS model retailed for with at an inflation-adjusted $26,348. But here’s the thing: Today’s base, V6
Camaro starts at $23,705. And while you can’t say that it has a V8, or SS
badges, you can smile contently when your “base” 2014 Camaro smokes the old
1967 Camaro SS in terms of performance. You certainly don’t need big, strong
V8’s in today’s sports cars to seek the kinds of thrills that 60’s muscle
produced. Sure, it’s all a bit more polished, controlled, and mitigated today.
But the cheapest sports cars of 2014 are just as fast as the most brutal baddies
from the muscle years, with few exceptions.
However, let's say you do want the upgrade. A high-performance 2014 V6
engine just isn’t enough. I understand; in fact I encourage it. The
aforementioned Camaro SS begins breaking the bank at $34,500, which means the
modern-day Z-28 model should price at around the same figures, right? Wrong!
Holy cow, I’ve never seen such a price disparity in all the Camaro’s near-forty
years. $55,505 sounds kinda spendy, right? Yeah, me too. But that isn’t the
price for a new Z/28. For this money you get the new Camaro ZL-1; it’s the most
powerful Camaro ever, but not the most expensive.
The all-new Camaro Z/28 will set you back………$72,305! (Insert mother-scolding expletive here) That’s well over double what a new Camaro SS sets you
back. What the hell?! Never mind that $72,305 equates to $10,153 in 1967 dollars, never
mind that a brand new 2014 Corvette starts at nearly $20K cheaper ($54,000),
and never mind that the original Z/28 was to be a toned-down-yet-still-powerful
alternative to its SS brother. Pshaw, I say. You can’t just resurrect a name
like Z/28 and slap it on the sides of this ballistic missile with four wheels
and two doors! Who do you think you are, Chevy?!
https://www.bing.com/images/search?sid=6137A2B203374FCABCC3DF9AD176FFEE&jsoncbid=0&q=camaro+z-28&qft=+filterui:license-L2_L3&FORM=R5IR41#view=detail&id=FDCB27604DF025C1216F678ED790ABA84A652CA4&selectedIndex=0
Please don’t mistake my outrage as anti-enthusiasm. I’m
thrilled that Chevy exhumed the Z/28 nameplate, I’m just not sure where they get off selling
a $71K factory Camaro. Its attributes are certainly attractive: 505hp from a big ol’
7.0Litre pushrod V8, 481lb-ft of torque, a 300-lb weight reduction over the
similarly deranged Camaro ZL-1. But I can’t decide if today’s Camaro Z/28 is the
spiritual successor of the original 1967 model. Both are track-focused;
race-car first and street-car second.
And by now you’re probably searching for a point to all
this. So am I. In the early 1900’s, small communities were in an uproar over
pool tables. By 1967, the Camaro’s introduction surely kept parents up all
night praying for the young-ins and their “muscle” cars. But look at what we
have today. The 1967 Camaro Z/28 might have been fast and exciting then, but in
2014 the Z/28 is downright scary! Luckily, for today’s parents, it’ll take a
significant windfall or years of very diligent saving for their kids to afford one. Hopefully
that’ll make ma and pa fritter less…
-Thanks for reading The Wheelspin Journal-
photo by the author